lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:42:30 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
	Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Use MAX_NICE to replace hard coding of 19.

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:13:13AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:37:32AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> > > cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>
> > > cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> 
> I get complaints about MAX_NICE being undefined, and I don't see any
> definition of MAX_NICE in sched.h as of 3.14-rc2.  Am I looking in
> the wrong place, or is this symbol not yet quite in mainline?

It is not.. its a proposed thingy. I'm still trying to make up my mind
on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ