[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140211174238.GW4250@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:42:39 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Use MAX_NICE to replace hard coding of 19.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:13:13AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:37:32AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> > > > cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>
> > > > cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> >
> > I get complaints about MAX_NICE being undefined, and I don't see any
> > definition of MAX_NICE in sched.h as of 3.14-rc2. Am I looking in
> > the wrong place, or is this symbol not yet quite in mainline?
>
> It is not.. its a proposed thingy. I'm still trying to make up my mind
> on it.
OK, will hold off then.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists