linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: LLVMLinux: use static inline in ARM ftrace.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <531EB4D8.6030207@converseincode.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:01:44 -0700
From:	Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To:	rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, kpark3469@...il.com
CC:	keun-o.park@...driver.com, dave.martin@...aro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: LLVMLinux: use static inline in ARM ftrace.h

On 02/20/14 18:22, behanw@...verseincode.com wrote:
> From: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
>
> With compilers which follow the C99 standard (like modern versions of gcc and
> clang), "extern inline" does the wrong thing (emits code for an externally
> linkable version of the inline function). In this case using static inline
> and removing the NULL version of return_address in return_address.c does
> the right thing.
Any input? Is it good as it is?

Behan

-- 
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/