[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1t61k6juph.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:19:54 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] DMA, CMA: support arbitrary bitmap granularity
On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> ppc kvm's cma region management requires arbitrary bitmap granularity,
> since they want to reserve very large memory and manage this region
> with bitmap that one bit for several pages to reduce management overheads.
> So support arbitrary bitmap granularity for following generalization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> index bc4c171..9bc9340 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct cma {
> unsigned long base_pfn;
> unsigned long count;
Have you considered replacing count with maxno?
> unsigned long *bitmap;
> + int order_per_bit; /* Order of pages represented by one bit */
I'd make it unsigned.
> struct mutex lock;
> };
>
> +static void clear_cma_bitmap(struct cma *cma, unsigned long pfn, int
> count)
For consistency cma_clear_bitmap would make more sense I think. On the
other hand, you're just moving stuff around so perhaps renaming the
function at this point is not worth it any more.
> +{
> + unsigned long bitmapno, nr_bits;
> +
> + bitmapno = (pfn - cma->base_pfn) >> cma->order_per_bit;
> + nr_bits = cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(cma, count);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> + bitmap_clear(cma->bitmap, bitmapno, nr_bits);
> + mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> +}
> +
> static int __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
> {
> - int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(cma->count) * sizeof(long);
> + int bitmap_maxno = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma);
> + int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(bitmap_maxno) * sizeof(long);
> unsigned long base_pfn = cma->base_pfn, pfn = base_pfn;
> unsigned i = cma->count >> pageblock_order;
> struct zone *zone;
bitmap_maxno is never used again, perhaps:
+ int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(cma_bitmap_maxno(cma)) * sizeof(long);
instead? Up to you.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists