linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf bench: futex: Support operations for shared futexes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140619170507.GA31524@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:05:07 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc:	jolsa@...nel.org, mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, aswin@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf bench: futex: Support operations for shared
 futexes

Em Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:43:49AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:41 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> > > Unlike futex-hash, requeuing and wakeup benchmarks do not support
> > > shared futexes, limiting the usefulness of the programs. Correct
> > > this, and allow using the local -S parameter. The default remains
> > > using private futexes.
> > 
> > Also isn't this benchmark related to something Darren did? Just checking
> > why he isn't in the CC list, Darren, does this all sound fine to you?
> 
> Darren is well aware of these benchmarks, and we've discussed the topic
> in the past. This change doesn't conflict with what he maintains in the
> futextest suite.

Ok, thanks, just checking :-)

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/