[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXP6GfO7OEnXU8x4Sn5j8_tA2nnrFANr1sriB-B4BYoOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:26:03 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] [RFC] ARM: dts: Add shmobile platform device tree
bindings documentation
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:23:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Add Renesas SH-Mobile, R-Mobile, and R-Car Platform Device Tree Bindings
>> Documentation, listing supported SoCs and boards.
>>
>> This allows to use checkpatch to validate DTSes referring to Renesas
>> shmobile SoCs, and boards containing those SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>
> Thanks Geert,
>
> from my point of view this seems nice. Is there a reason it is marked as an RFC?
>From the cover letter:
"The last 4 patches contain compatible strings for new R-Car Gen2 SoCs,
which are not yet in active use, hence the RFC status."
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists