[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140711150921.GA1777@verge.net.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:09:22 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] [RFC] ARM: dts: Add shmobile platform device tree
bindings documentation
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 04:26:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:23:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Add Renesas SH-Mobile, R-Mobile, and R-Car Platform Device Tree Bindings
> >> Documentation, listing supported SoCs and boards.
> >>
> >> This allows to use checkpatch to validate DTSes referring to Renesas
> >> shmobile SoCs, and boards containing those SoCs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >
> > Thanks Geert,
> >
> > from my point of view this seems nice. Is there a reason it is marked as an RFC?
>
> >From the cover letter:
>
> "The last 4 patches contain compatible strings for new R-Car Gen2 SoCs,
> which are not yet in active use, hence the RFC status."
Thanks, sorry for missing that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists