[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUPpP1Lo1gB_eTm6V3pJ3Fam-1gPZGKfksOXXGgtNGsEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:56:57 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, tomi.valkeinen@...com,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/11] x86, mm, pat: Change reserve_memtype() to handle
WT type
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> This patch changes reserve_memtype() to handle the new WT type.
> When (!pat_enabled && new_type), it continues to set either WB
> or UC- to *new_type. When pat_enabled, it can reserve a given
> non-RAM range for WT. At this point, it may not reserve a RAM
> range for WT since reserve_ram_pages_type() uses the page flags
> limited to three memory types, WB, WC and UC.
FWIW, last time I looked at this, it seemed like all the fancy
reserve_ram_pages stuff was unnecessary: shouldn't the RAM type be
easy to track in the direct map page tables?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists