[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lhqp8uvu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:04:13 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: kpark3469@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: keun-o.park@...driver.com, hpa@...or.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, oleg@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] earlyprintk: re-enable earlyprintk calling early_param
kpark3469@...il.com writes:
> From: Sahara <keun-o.park@...driver.com>
>
> Although there are many obs_kernel_param and its names are
> earlyprintk and also EARLY_PRINTK is also enabled, we could not
> see the early_printk output properly until now. This patch
> considers earlycon as well as earlyprintk.
Hmm, the initial "earlycon" hack slipped in when I wasn't looking.
I don't think we should extend it.
Why not make the thing(s) you want early_param()s?
Cheers,
Rusty.
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ static int __init do_early_param(char *param, char *val, const char *unused)
> for (p = __setup_start; p < __setup_end; p++) {
> if ((p->early && parameq(param, p->str)) ||
> (strcmp(param, "console") == 0 &&
> - strcmp(p->str, "earlycon") == 0)
> + ((strcmp(p->str, "earlycon") == 0) ||
> + (strcmp(p->str, "earlyprintk") == 0)))
> ) {
> if (p->setup_func(val) != 0)
> pr_warn("Malformed early option '%s'\n", param);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists