[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140821134632.GF20546@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:46:33 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@...com>,
Hui-Zhi <hui-zhi.zhao@...com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: VMX: dynamise PLE window
2014-08-21 15:18+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 21/08/2014 14:42, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> > 2014-08-21 14:29+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> >> Il 21/08/2014 13:54, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> >>> Guity as charged.
> >>> Using 0/1 or true/false in this context directly would be pretty bad ...
> >>> Is enum fine? (SHIRINK_PLE_WINDOW, GROW_PLE_WINDOW?)
> >>
> >> I prefer good old Ctrl-C Ctrl-V (adjusted for your favorite editor). :)
> >
> > I, I should be able to do it, but nightmares are going to last a while.
> >
> > (And to lower chances of v4: are tracepoint macros, like for kvm_apic,
> > frowned upon now?)
>
> Nah, go ahead. But is there any example of #define like what you were
> doing? I tried grepping for "#define.*[a-z]\(" and didn't get anything
> similar.
No, at least not in KVM code, it was the same idea as tracepoints:
less magical constants at the cost of (syntactic) indirection.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists