[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd9a50c81d3a402594a30cdd39220614@BY2PR0301MB0613.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:02:43 +0000
From: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"timur@...i.org" <timur@...i.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>, "tiwai@...e.de" <tiwai@...e.de>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
'big-endian-data'.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of
> 'big-endian-data'.
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com
> <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com> wrote:
> > > > This property used for configuring whether the LSB or the MSB is
> transmitted
> > > > first for the fifo data.
> > >
> > > I don't follow the rationale for this change.
> > >
> > > This looks like a pointless renaming.
> > >
> > > Why is this any better?
> > >
> >
> > This is originally to indicate whether the LSB firstly or MSB firstly will
> be
> > transmitted to the CODEC or received from the CODEC, and there has nothing
> > Relation to the memory data.
> >
> > Generally, if the audio data in big endian format, which will be using the
> bytes
> > Reversion ? Here this can only be used to bits reversion.
>
> That's why I suggested previously: mention it in the commit comment.
>
> People will have no idea about what's the exact reason for this change.
> Any functional enhancement? Or a bug fix(more likely for this one).
> I'm not sure what I described in the previous mail is correct or not.
> But you probably should have added it into the commit comments.
>
> And Xiubo, this patch still hasn't fixed the issue of breaking the old DT,
> although system can pass during the probe() section.
>
Beside LS1+, who else is using this now ? And the LS1 dts files are still doing
The upstream for now.
Thanks,
BRs
Xiubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists