[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140916234543.GA22408@vmdeb7>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:45:43 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eeepc-laptop: simplify parse_arg()
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:37:39PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > parse_arg() has three possible return values:
> > -EINVAL if sscanf(), in short, fails;
> > zero if "count" is zero; and
> > "count" in all other cases
> >
> > But "count" will never be zero. See, parse_arg() is called by the
> > various store functions. And the callchain of these functions starts
> > with sysfs_kf_write(). And that function checks for a zero "count". So
> > we can stop checking for a zero "count", drop the "count" argument
> > entirely, and transform parse_arg() into a function that returns zero on
> > success or a negative error. That, in turn, allows to make those store
> > functions just return "count" on success. The net effect is that the
> > code becomes a bit easier to understand.
> >
> > While we're at it, let store_sys_acpi() return whatever error set_acpi()
> > returns instead of remapping it to EIO.
> >
> > A nice side effect is that this GCC warning is silenced too:
> > drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c: In function ‘store_sys_acpi’:
> > drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c:279:10: warning: ‘value’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > int rv, value;
> >
> > Which is, of course, the reason to have a look at parse_arg().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
>
> Queued, thanks Paul.
After discussion with Linus, I have had to drop this patch from the queue. We
need to restore the -EIO error code mapping to store_sys_acpi().
Apologies for the run around here, we had to define some policy around this.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists