linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Remove unlikely() annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140920121740.GA3850@katana>
Date:	Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:17:42 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, heiko@...ech.de,
	max.schwarz@...ine.de, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: Remove unlikely() annotations

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:43:44AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Having a transfer more than 32 bits is not all that unlikely.  Remove
> the annotation.
> 
> The unlikely in the IRQ handler can't gain us much.  It's not in a
> loop, so at most it would save 1 instruction per IRQ, which isn't
> much.  In fact on the compiler I tested it produced the exact same
> code.  Remove it too.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Applied to for-next, thanks!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)