[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141008113735.GQ23154@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:37:35 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
Cc: lidza.louina@...il.com, markh@...pro.net,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: dgap: introduce dgap_stop()
All three of these patches are good and a nice improvement. This one is
a good bugfix. I have some notes for later, though below.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:13:56PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c b/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
> index 7c79fe6..00f34b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for the Digi International EPCA PCI based product lin
> MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("dgap");
>
> static int dgap_start(void);
> +static void dgap_stop(void);
These kinds of forward declarations are annoying. The whole file needs
to be re-arranged so that we don't have to deal with them.
> @@ -561,6 +563,21 @@ failed_class:
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static void dgap_stop(void)
> +{
> + ulong lock_flags;
This is non-standard. Traditionally it would be:
unsigned long flags;
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists