[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141017095555.GA360@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:55:55 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: michaelc@...wisc.edu
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: add function to issue compare and write
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:37:12AM -0500, michaelc@...wisc.edu wrote:
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
> __REQ_DISCARD, /* request to discard sectors */
> __REQ_SECURE, /* secure discard (used with __REQ_DISCARD) */
> __REQ_WRITE_SAME, /* write same block many times */
> -
> + __REQ_CMP_AND_WRITE, /* compare data and write if matched */
I think it's time that we stop overloading the request flags with
request types.
We already have req->cmd_type which actually is a fairly good
description of what we get except for REQ_TYPE_FS, which is a horrible
overload using req->cmd_flags.
Given that you're just one of many currently ongoing patches to add
more flags here I think you need to byte the bullet and fix this up
by replacing REQ_TYPE_FS with:
REQ_TYPE_WRITE
REQ_TYPE_READ
REQ_TYPE_FLUSH
REQ_TYPE_DISCARD
REQ_TYPE_WRITE_SAME
REQ_TYPE_CMP_AND_WRITE
sd.c is a nice guide of what should be a flag and what a type since my
last refactoring of the command_init function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists