linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] UBIFS: fix a couple bugs in UBIFS xattr length calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1415356480.958.315.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:34:40 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@...com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@...d-net.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] UBIFS: fix a couple bugs in UBIFS xattr length
 calculation

On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 13:50 -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> From: Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@...d-net.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@...d-net.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@...com>
> Acked-by: Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@...com>
> Acked-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>

It looks like these patches are against an old kernel. In the new kernel
"dir_ui" was renamed to "host_ui", to show that this is not just a
directory inode, but a directory or an xattr inode (we call the "host"
inodes, since the "host" the xattr value).

I've pushed this patch in a modified form.

Do you have a possibility to test this series with a newer kernel?

Here is the patch I pushed:


>From a76284e6f89b2ae37d413fe793752257be01765a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@...d-net.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:50:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] UBIFS: fix a couple bugs in UBIFS xattr length calculation

The journal update function did not work for extended attributes properly,
because extended attribute inodes carry the xattr data, and the size of this
data was not taken into account.

Artem: improved commit message, amended the patch a bit.

Signed-off-by: Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@...d-net.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@...com>
Acked-by: Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@...com>
Acked-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
---
 fs/ubifs/journal.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/journal.c b/fs/ubifs/journal.c
index fb166e2..f6ac3f2 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/journal.c
@@ -571,7 +571,11 @@ int ubifs_jnl_update(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir,
 
 	aligned_dlen = ALIGN(dlen, 8);
 	aligned_ilen = ALIGN(ilen, 8);
+
 	len = aligned_dlen + aligned_ilen + UBIFS_INO_NODE_SZ;
+	/* Make sure to also account for extended attributes */
+	len += host_ui->data_len;
+
 	dent = kmalloc(len, GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!dent)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -648,7 +652,8 @@ int ubifs_jnl_update(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir,
 
 	ino_key_init(c, &ino_key, dir->i_ino);
 	ino_offs += aligned_ilen;
-	err = ubifs_tnc_add(c, &ino_key, lnum, ino_offs, UBIFS_INO_NODE_SZ);
+	err = ubifs_tnc_add(c, &ino_key, lnum, ino_offs,
+			    UBIFS_INO_NODE_SZ + host_ui->data_len);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_ro;
 
-- 
1.9.3

Artem.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/