[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141107103440.GD8509@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:34:40 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com, geunsik.lim@...sung.com,
inki.dae@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Documentation: Add documentation for rt5033
multifunction device
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:52:07AM +0900, Beomho Seo wrote:
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible = Must be "richtek,rt5033-regulator"
> +
> + regulators {
> + compatible = "richtek,rt5033-regulator";
There should be no need for this extra compatible, it's not adding
anything we didn't know from the fact that it's part of the MFD.
> + regulator-name {
> + regulator-name = LDO/BUCK
> + standard regulator constraints...
> + };
Better to just say something like "regulator subnodes called X, Y and Z"
described using the standard regulator binding in...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists