| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20141110144405.GA6873@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:44:05 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] mm: vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers for each lruvec
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:46:40PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 06:50:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > The slab shrinkers currently rely on the reclaim code providing an
> > ad-hoc concept of NUMA nodes that doesn't really exist: for all
> > scanned zones and lruvecs, the nodes and available LRU pages are
> > summed up, only to have the shrinkers then again walk that nodemask
> > when scanning slab caches. This duplication will only get worse and
> > more expensive once the shrinkers become aware of cgroups.
>
> As i said previously, it's not an "ad-hoc concept". It's exactly the
> same NUMA abstraction that the VM presents to anyone who wants to
> control memory allocation locality. i.e. node IDs and node masks.
That's what the page allocator takes as input, but it's translated to
zones fairly quickly, and it definitely doesn't exist in the reclaim
code anymore. The way we reconstruct the node view on that level
really is ad-hoc. And that is a problem. It's not just duplicative,
it's also that reclaim really needs the ability to target types of
zones in order to meet allocation constraints, and right now we just
scatter-shoot slab objects and hope we free some desired zone memory.
I don't see any intrinsic value in symmetry here, especially since we
can easily encapsulate how the lists are organized for the shrinkers.
Vladimir is already pushing the interface in that direction: add
object, remove object, walk objects according to this shrink_control.
> > Instead, invoke the shrinkers for each lruvec scanned - which is
> > either the zone level, or in case of cgroups, the subset of a zone's
> > pages that is charged to the scanned memcg. The number of eligible
> > LRU pages is naturally available at that level - it is even more
> > accurate than simply looking at the global state and the number of
> > available swap pages, as get_scan_count() considers many other factors
> > when deciding which LRU pages to consider.
> >
> > This invokes the shrinkers more often and with smaller page and scan
> > counts, but the ratios remain the same, and the shrinkers themselves
> > do not add significantly to the existing per-lruvec cost.
>
> That goes in the opposite direction is which we've found filesystem
> shrinkers operate most effectively. i.e. larger batches with less
> frequent reclaim callouts tend to result in more consistent
> performance because shrinkers take locks and do IO that other
> application operations get stuck behind (shrink_batch exists
> for this reason ;).
Kswapd, which does the majority of reclaim - unless pressure mounts
too high - already invokes the shrinkers per-zone, so this seems like
a granularity we should generally get away with.
> > This integrates the slab shrinking nicely into the reclaim logic. Not
> > just conceptually, but it also allows kswapd, the direct reclaim code,
> > and zone reclaim to get rid of their ad-hoc custom slab shrinking.
> >
> > Lastly, this facilitates making the shrinkers cgroup-aware without a
> > fantastic amount code and runtime work duplication, and consolidation
> > will make hierarchy walk optimizations easier later on.
>
> It still makes callers have to care about internal VM metrics
> to calculate how much work they should do. Callers should be able to
> pass in a measure of how much work the shrinker should do (e.g. as
> a percentage of cache size). Even the VM can use this - it can take
> it's scanned/pages variables and use them to calculate the
> percentage of caches to free, and the shrinker loop can then be
> completely free of any relationship to the LRU page reclaim
> implementation.....
>
> e.g. drop_caches() should just be able to call "shrink_slab_all()"
> and not have to care about nodes, batch sizes, detect when caches
> are empty, etc. Similarly shake_page() only wants
> "shrink_slab_node_nr()" to free a small amount of objects from the
> node it cares about each time.
>
> i.e. we should be writing helpers to remove shrinker implementation
> quirks from callers, not driving more of the quirks into external
> callers...
Yes, that is something we should do, but it seems orthogonal for now.
We can always wrap up the interface once we agree on how to organize
the objects.
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 1 -
> > fs/drop_caches.c | 15 ++--
> > include/linux/shrinker.h | 2 -
> > mm/memory-failure.c | 3 +-
> > mm/vmscan.c | 164 +++++++++++++--------------------------
> > 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
> >
> > I put this together as a result of the discussion with Vladimir about
> > memcg-aware slab shrinkers this morning.
> >
> > This might need some tuning, but it definitely looks like the right
> > thing to do conceptually. I'm currently playing with various slab-
> > and memcg-heavy workloads (many numa nodes + many cgroups = many
> > shrinker invocations) but so far the numbers look okay.
> >
> > It would be great if other people could weigh in, and possibly also
> > expose it to their favorite filesystem and reclaim stress tests.
>
> Causes substantial increase in performance variability on inode
> intensive benchmarks. On my standard fsmark benchmark, I see file
> creates sit at around 250,000/sec, but there's several second long
> dips to about 50,000/sec co-inciding with the inode cache being
> trimmed by several million inodes. Looking more deeply, this is due
> to memory pressure driving inode writeback - we're reclaiming inodes
> that haven't yet been written to disk, and so by reclaiming the
> inode cache slab more frequently it's driving larger peaks of IO
> and blocking ongoing filesystem operations more frequently.
>
> My initial thoughts are that this correlates with the above comments
> I made about frequency of shrinker calls and batch sizes, so I
> suspect that the aggregation of shrinker-based reclaim work is
> necessary to minimise the interference that recalim causes at the
> filesystem level...
Could you share the benchmark you are running? Also, how many nodes
does this machine have?
My suspicion is that invoking the shrinkers per-zone against the same
old per-node lists incorrectly triples the slab pressure relative to
the lru pressure. Kswapd already does this, but I'm guessing it
matters less under lower pressure, and once pressure mounts direct
reclaim takes over, which my patch made more aggressive.
Organizing the slab objects on per-zone lists would solve this, and
would also allow proper zone reclaim to meet allocation restraints.
But for now, how about the following patch that invokes the shrinkers
once per node, but uses the allocator's preferred zone as the pivot
for nr_scanned / nr_eligible instead of summing up the node? That
doesn't increase the current number of slab invocations, actually
reduces them for kswapd, but would put the shrinker calls at a more
natural level for reclaim, and would also allow us to go ahead with
the cgroup-aware slab shrinkers.
---
>From a5b19616822564ae880f0ae22b8a8cb96b2c71a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:30:27 -0500
Subject: [patch] mm: vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()
The slab shrinkers are currently invoked from the zonelist walkers in
kswapd, direct reclaim, and zone reclaim, all of which roughly gauge
the eligible LRU pages and assemble a nodemask to pass to NUMA-aware
shrinkers, which then again have to walk over the nodemask. This is
redundant code, extra runtime work, and fairly inaccurate when it
comes to the estimation of actually scannable LRU pages. The code
duplication will only get worse when making the shrinkers cgroup-aware
and requiring them to have out-of-band cgroup hierarchy walks as well.
Instead, invoke the shrinkers from shrink_zone(), which is where all
reclaimers end up, to avoid this duplication.
Take the count for eligible LRU pages out of get_scan_count(), which
considers many more factors than just the availability of swap space,
like zone_reclaimable_pages() currently does. Accumulate the number
over all visited lruvecs to get the per-zone value.
Some nodes have multiple zones due to memory addressing restrictions.
To avoid putting too much pressure on the shrinkers, only invoke them
once for each such node, using the class zone of the allocation as the
pivot zone. At some point, we may want to think about organizing slab
objects directly on per-zone lists instead, which would also allow
targetting them more directly under zone-constrained allocations.
For now, this integrates the slab shrinking better into the reclaim
logic and gets rid of duplicative invocations from kswapd, direct
reclaim, and zone reclaim. It also prepares for cgroup-awareness,
allowing memcg-capable shrinkers to be added at the lruvec level
without much duplication of both code and runtime work.
Not-yet-signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 3 +-
fs/drop_caches.c | 11 ++-
include/linux/mm.h | 6 +-
include/linux/shrinker.h | 2 -
mm/memory-failure.c | 11 +--
mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +-
mm/vmscan.c | 208 +++++++++++++++------------------------
7 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
index ad4f5790a76f..46f8ef42559e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ out:
}
/*
- * ashmem_shrink - our cache shrinker, called from mm/vmscan.c :: shrink_slab
+ * ashmem_shrink - our cache shrinker, called from mm/vmscan.c
*
* 'nr_to_scan' is the number of objects to scan for freeing.
*
@@ -785,7 +785,6 @@ static long ashmem_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
.nr_to_scan = LONG_MAX,
};
ret = ashmem_shrink_count(&ashmem_shrinker, &sc);
- nodes_setall(sc.nodes_to_scan);
ashmem_shrink_scan(&ashmem_shrinker, &sc);
}
break;
diff --git a/fs/drop_caches.c b/fs/drop_caches.c
index 1de7294aad20..2bc2c87f35e7 100644
--- a/fs/drop_caches.c
+++ b/fs/drop_caches.c
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
static void drop_slab(void)
{
int nr_objects;
- struct shrink_control shrink = {
- .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
- };
- nodes_setall(shrink.nodes_to_scan);
do {
- nr_objects = shrink_slab(&shrink, 1000, 1000);
+ int nid;
+
+ nr_objects = 0;
+ for_each_online_node(nid)
+ nr_objects += shrink_node_slabs(GFP_KERNEL, nid,
+ 1000, 1000);
} while (nr_objects > 10);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 3c3bb024f8e8..6ce99da4d7a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2089,9 +2089,9 @@ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
#endif
-unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink,
- unsigned long nr_pages_scanned,
- unsigned long lru_pages);
+unsigned long shrink_node_slabs(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
+ unsigned long nr_scanned,
+ unsigned long nr_eligible);
#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
#define randomize_va_space 0
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 68c097077ef0..f4aee75f00b1 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ struct shrink_control {
*/
unsigned long nr_to_scan;
- /* shrink from these nodes */
- nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
/* current node being shrunk (for NUMA aware shrinkers) */
int nid;
};
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index e619625489c2..5174f6f27385 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -239,19 +239,14 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p, int access)
}
/*
- * Only call shrink_slab here (which would also shrink other caches) if
- * access is not potentially fatal.
+ * Only call shrink_node_slabs here (which would also shrink
+ * other caches) if access is not potentially fatal.
*/
if (access) {
int nr;
int nid = page_to_nid(p);
do {
- struct shrink_control shrink = {
- .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
- };
- node_set(nid, shrink.nodes_to_scan);
-
- nr = shrink_slab(&shrink, 1000, 1000);
+ nr = shrink_node_slabs(GFP_KERNEL, nid, 1000, 1000);
if (page_count(p) == 1)
break;
} while (nr > 10);
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 7536b50768ed..7d425b2a1a35 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6263,9 +6263,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
if (!PageLRU(page))
found++;
/*
- * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check it.
- * But now, memory offline itself doesn't call shrink_slab()
- * and it still to be fixed.
+ * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
+ * it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
+ * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed.
*/
/*
* If the page is not RAM, page_count()should be 0.
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a384339bf718..8c2b45bfe610 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -229,9 +229,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_shrinker);
#define SHRINK_BATCH 128
-static unsigned long
-shrink_slab_node(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, struct shrinker *shrinker,
- unsigned long nr_pages_scanned, unsigned long lru_pages)
+static unsigned long shrink_slabs(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
+ struct shrinker *shrinker,
+ unsigned long nr_scanned,
+ unsigned long nr_eligible)
{
unsigned long freed = 0;
unsigned long long delta;
@@ -255,9 +256,9 @@ shrink_slab_node(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, struct shrinker *shrinker,
nr = atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0);
total_scan = nr;
- delta = (4 * nr_pages_scanned) / shrinker->seeks;
+ delta = (4 * nr_scanned) / shrinker->seeks;
delta *= freeable;
- do_div(delta, lru_pages + 1);
+ do_div(delta, nr_eligible + 1);
total_scan += delta;
if (total_scan < 0) {
pr_err("shrink_slab: %pF negative objects to delete nr=%ld\n",
@@ -289,8 +290,8 @@ shrink_slab_node(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, struct shrinker *shrinker,
total_scan = freeable * 2;
trace_mm_shrink_slab_start(shrinker, shrinkctl, nr,
- nr_pages_scanned, lru_pages,
- freeable, delta, total_scan);
+ nr_scanned, nr_eligible,
+ freeable, delta, total_scan);
/*
* Normally, we should not scan less than batch_size objects in one
@@ -339,34 +340,37 @@ shrink_slab_node(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, struct shrinker *shrinker,
return freed;
}
-/*
- * Call the shrink functions to age shrinkable caches
- *
- * Here we assume it costs one seek to replace a lru page and that it also
- * takes a seek to recreate a cache object. With this in mind we age equal
- * percentages of the lru and ageable caches. This should balance the seeks
- * generated by these structures.
+/**
+ * shrink_node_slabs - shrink slab caches of a given node
+ * @gfp_mask: allocation context
+ * @nid: node whose slab caches to target
+ * @nr_scanned: pressure numerator
+ * @nr_eligible: pressure denominator
*
- * If the vm encountered mapped pages on the LRU it increase the pressure on
- * slab to avoid swapping.
+ * Call the shrink functions to age shrinkable caches.
*
- * We do weird things to avoid (scanned*seeks*entries) overflowing 32 bits.
+ * @nid is passed along to shrinkers with SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE set,
+ * unaware shrinkers will receive a node id of 0 instead.
*
- * `lru_pages' represents the number of on-LRU pages in all the zones which
- * are eligible for the caller's allocation attempt. It is used for balancing
- * slab reclaim versus page reclaim.
+ * @nr_scanned and @nr_eligible form a ratio that indicate how much of
+ * the available objects should be scanned. Page reclaim for example
+ * passes the number of pages scanned and the number of pages on the
+ * LRU lists that it considered on @nid, plus a bias in @nr_scanned
+ * when it encountered mapped pages. The ratio is further biased by
+ * the ->seeks setting of the shrink function, which indicates the
+ * cost to recreate an object relative to that of an LRU page.
*
- * Returns the number of slab objects which we shrunk.
+ * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
*/
-unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
- unsigned long nr_pages_scanned,
- unsigned long lru_pages)
+unsigned long shrink_node_slabs(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
+ unsigned long nr_scanned,
+ unsigned long nr_eligible)
{
struct shrinker *shrinker;
unsigned long freed = 0;
- if (nr_pages_scanned == 0)
- nr_pages_scanned = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
+ if (nr_scanned == 0)
+ nr_scanned = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
/*
@@ -380,20 +384,17 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
}
list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
- if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) {
- shrinkctl->nid = 0;
- freed += shrink_slab_node(shrinkctl, shrinker,
- nr_pages_scanned, lru_pages);
- continue;
- }
+ struct shrink_control sc = {
+ .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
+ .nid = nid,
+ };
- for_each_node_mask(shrinkctl->nid, shrinkctl->nodes_to_scan) {
- if (node_online(shrinkctl->nid))
- freed += shrink_slab_node(shrinkctl, shrinker,
- nr_pages_scanned, lru_pages);
+ if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
+ sc.nid = 0;
- }
+ freed += shrink_slabs(&sc, shrinker, nr_scanned, nr_eligible);
}
+
up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
out:
cond_resched();
@@ -1876,7 +1877,8 @@ enum scan_balance {
* nr[2] = file inactive pages to scan; nr[3] = file active pages to scan
*/
static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
- struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *nr)
+ struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *nr,
+ unsigned long *lru_pages)
{
struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
u64 fraction[2];
@@ -2022,6 +2024,7 @@ out:
some_scanned = false;
/* Only use force_scan on second pass. */
for (pass = 0; !some_scanned && pass < 2; pass++) {
+ *lru_pages = 0;
for_each_evictable_lru(lru) {
int file = is_file_lru(lru);
unsigned long size;
@@ -2048,14 +2051,19 @@ out:
case SCAN_FILE:
case SCAN_ANON:
/* Scan one type exclusively */
- if ((scan_balance == SCAN_FILE) != file)
+ if ((scan_balance == SCAN_FILE) != file) {
+ size = 0;
scan = 0;
+ }
break;
default:
/* Look ma, no brain */
BUG();
}
+
+ *lru_pages += size;
nr[lru] = scan;
+
/*
* Skip the second pass and don't force_scan,
* if we found something to scan.
@@ -2069,7 +2077,7 @@ out:
* This is a basic per-zone page freer. Used by both kswapd and direct reclaim.
*/
static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
- struct scan_control *sc)
+ struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *lru_pages)
{
unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
@@ -2080,7 +2088,7 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
struct blk_plug plug;
bool scan_adjusted;
- get_scan_count(lruvec, swappiness, sc, nr);
+ get_scan_count(lruvec, swappiness, sc, nr, lru_pages);
/* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
memcpy(targets, nr, sizeof(nr));
@@ -2258,7 +2266,8 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
}
}
-static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
+static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
+ bool is_classzone)
{
unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
bool reclaimable = false;
@@ -2269,6 +2278,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
.zone = zone,
.priority = sc->priority,
};
+ unsigned long zone_lru_pages = 0;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
@@ -2276,13 +2286,15 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
do {
+ unsigned long lru_pages;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
int swappiness;
lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, sc);
+ shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, sc, &lru_pages);
+ zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
/*
* Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
@@ -2302,6 +2314,25 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim);
} while (memcg);
+ /*
+ * Shrink the slab caches in the same proportion that
+ * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
+ */
+ if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone) {
+ struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state;
+
+ shrink_node_slabs(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
+ sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
+ zone_lru_pages);
+
+ reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
+ if (reclaim_state) {
+ sc->nr_reclaimed +=
+ reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
+ reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
@@ -2376,12 +2407,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
struct zone *zone;
unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
- unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
- struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
gfp_t orig_mask;
- struct shrink_control shrink = {
- .gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask,
- };
enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
bool reclaimable = false;
@@ -2394,10 +2420,8 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
if (buffer_heads_over_limit)
sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
- nodes_clear(shrink.nodes_to_scan);
-
for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
- gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
+ requested_highidx, sc->nodemask) {
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
/*
@@ -2409,9 +2433,6 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HARDWALL))
continue;
- lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
- node_set(zone_to_nid(zone), shrink.nodes_to_scan);
-
if (sc->priority != DEF_PRIORITY &&
!zone_reclaimable(zone))
continue; /* Let kswapd poll it */
@@ -2450,7 +2471,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
}
- if (shrink_zone(zone, sc))
+ if (shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == requested_highidx))
reclaimable = true;
if (global_reclaim(sc) &&
@@ -2459,20 +2480,6 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
}
/*
- * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from over limit cgroups
- * but do shrink slab at least once when aborting reclaim for
- * compaction to avoid unevenly scanning file/anon LRU pages over slab
- * pages.
- */
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
- shrink_slab(&shrink, sc->nr_scanned, lru_pages);
- if (reclaim_state) {
- sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
- reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
- }
- }
-
- /*
* Restore to original mask to avoid the impact on the caller if we
* promoted it to __GFP_HIGHMEM.
*/
@@ -2736,6 +2743,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
};
struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
int swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
+ unsigned long lru_pages;
sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
@@ -2751,7 +2759,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* will pick up pages from other mem cgroup's as well. We hack
* the priority and make it zero.
*/
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, &sc);
+ shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, &sc, &lru_pages);
trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
@@ -2932,15 +2940,10 @@ static bool prepare_kswapd_sleep(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining,
static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
int classzone_idx,
struct scan_control *sc,
- unsigned long lru_pages,
unsigned long *nr_attempted)
{
int testorder = sc->order;
unsigned long balance_gap;
- struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
- struct shrink_control shrink = {
- .gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask,
- };
bool lowmem_pressure;
/* Reclaim above the high watermark. */
@@ -2975,13 +2978,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
balance_gap, classzone_idx))
return true;
- shrink_zone(zone, sc);
- nodes_clear(shrink.nodes_to_scan);
- node_set(zone_to_nid(zone), shrink.nodes_to_scan);
-
- reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
- shrink_slab(&shrink, sc->nr_scanned, lru_pages);
- sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
+ shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
/* Account for the number of pages attempted to reclaim */
*nr_attempted += sc->nr_to_reclaim;
@@ -3042,7 +3039,6 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
count_vm_event(PAGEOUTRUN);
do {
- unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
unsigned long nr_attempted = 0;
bool raise_priority = true;
bool pgdat_needs_compaction = (order > 0);
@@ -3102,8 +3098,6 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
- lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
-
/*
* If any zone is currently balanced then kswapd will
* not call compaction as it is expected that the
@@ -3159,8 +3153,8 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
* that that high watermark would be met at 100%
* efficiency.
*/
- if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, end_zone, &sc,
- lru_pages, &nr_attempted))
+ if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, end_zone,
+ &sc, &nr_attempted))
raise_priority = false;
}
@@ -3612,10 +3606,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP),
.may_swap = 1,
};
- struct shrink_control shrink = {
- .gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
- };
- unsigned long nr_slab_pages0, nr_slab_pages1;
cond_resched();
/*
@@ -3634,44 +3624,10 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
* priorities until we have enough memory freed.
*/
do {
- shrink_zone(zone, &sc);
+ shrink_zone(zone, &sc, true);
} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
}
- nr_slab_pages0 = zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
- if (nr_slab_pages0 > zone->min_slab_pages) {
- /*
- * shrink_slab() does not currently allow us to determine how
- * many pages were freed in this zone. So we take the current
- * number of slab pages and shake the slab until it is reduced
- * by the same nr_pages that we used for reclaiming unmapped
- * pages.
- */
- nodes_clear(shrink.nodes_to_scan);
- node_set(zone_to_nid(zone), shrink.nodes_to_scan);
- for (;;) {
- unsigned long lru_pages = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
-
- /* No reclaimable slab or very low memory pressure */
- if (!shrink_slab(&shrink, sc.nr_scanned, lru_pages))
- break;
-
- /* Freed enough memory */
- nr_slab_pages1 = zone_page_state(zone,
- NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
- if (nr_slab_pages1 + nr_pages <= nr_slab_pages0)
- break;
- }
-
- /*
- * Update nr_reclaimed by the number of slab pages we
- * reclaimed from this zone.
- */
- nr_slab_pages1 = zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
- if (nr_slab_pages1 < nr_slab_pages0)
- sc.nr_reclaimed += nr_slab_pages0 - nr_slab_pages1;
- }
-
p->reclaim_state = NULL;
current->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE);
lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists