[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <655928d0462248b6a8e4821b5245bc57@BN1BFFO11FD016.protection.gbl>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:11:03 -0800
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
CC: <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<michal.simek@...inx.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<harinik@...inx.com>, <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>,
Vishnu Motghare <vishnum@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: cadence: Check for errata condition
involving master receive
Hi Harini,
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 01:38PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> Cadence I2C controller has the following bugs:
> - completion indication is not given to the driver at the end of
> a read/receive transfer with HOLD bit set.
> - Invalid read transaction are generated on the bus when HW timeout
> condition occurs with HOLD bit set.
>
> As a result of the above, if a set of messages to be transferred with
> repeated start includes any transfer following a read transfer,
> completion is never indicated and timeout occurs.
> Hence a check is implemented to return -EOPNOTSUPP for such sequences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Motghare <vishnum@...inx.com>
> ---
>
> v3:
> Add warning in case of unsupported transfer.
>
> v2:
> Dont defeteature repeated start. Just check for unsupported conditions in the
> driver and return error.
>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
> index 5f5d4fa..3ea3b7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
> @@ -541,6 +541,21 @@ static int cdns_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> * processed with a repeated start.
> */
> if (num > 1) {
> + /*
> + * This controller does not give completion interrupt after a
> + * master receive transfer if HOLD bit is set (repeated start),
> + * resulting in SW timeout. Hence, if a receive transfer is
> + * followed by any other transfer, an error is returned
> + * indicating that this sequence is not supported.
> + */
> + for (count = 0; count < num-1; count++) {
> + if (msgs[count].flags & I2C_M_RD)
> + dev_warn(adap->dev.parent,
> + "No support for repeated start when\t");
> + dev_warn(adap->dev.parent,
> + "receive is followed by a transfer\n");
Please make this a single dev_warn without a line break in the string.
That way you can grep for the message in the sources.
Thanks,
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists