[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1419860736.14143.13.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:45:36 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Fillot <cf@....fr>
Cc: linux-ima-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-ima-user] Initramfs and IMA Appraisal
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:15 +0100, Christophe Fillot wrote:
> >
> > Are you using an initrd not an initramfs? According to
> > Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt, "If
> CONFIG_TMPFS
> > is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by default".
> >
> Yes, that what I thought too, but it seems that it is not really the
> case because of this test:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && !saved_root_name[0] &&
> (!root_fs_names || strstr(root_fs_names, "tmpfs"))) {
> err = shmem_init();
> is_tmpfs = true;
> } else {
> err = init_ramfs_fs();
> }
[CC'ing Rob Landley, lsm, lkml]
Thanks! "saved_root_name" is set to the boot command line "root="
option, which in my case is the UUID. I'm not sure why real root should
impact the initramfs tmpfs/ramfs decision.
Unless there is a good explanation, did you want to post a patch to
remove the test?
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists