[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54A2A5DD.2030502@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:17:17 +0200
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <chris@...ntf.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: edma: Split up header file to platform_data
and API file
On 12/08/2014 02:49 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> include/linux/platform_data/ is not a correct place to keep the API
>> definitions for edma, it is meant to be only for the pdata for the device.
>> Clean up this by moving the API to include/linux/edma.h
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/common/edma.c | 3 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 1 +
>> drivers/dma/edma.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/edma.h | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/platform_data/edma.h | 148 ++--------------------------
>> sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.h | 1 +
>> 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/edma.h
> I was hoping that this will have delete for platform_data/edma.h, do we
> still need that and why shouldn't we get rid of this :)
We still need it for the legacy boot of davinci devices. We can boot some
davinci SoC/boards with DT, but not all of them.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists