[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150105162145.GO15833@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:21:45 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] libata: export ata_get_cmd_descript()
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 07:35:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 20:25 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 12/12/2014 06:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > The driver sata_dwc_460ex is using this symbol. To build it as a module we have
> > > to have the symbol exported. This patch adds EXPORT_SYMBOL() macro for that.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > > index 3dbec89..74fef87 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> > > @@ -2389,6 +2389,7 @@ const char *ata_get_cmd_descript(u8 command)
> > >
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_get_cmd_descript);
> >
> > Why not EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?
>
> Some of the symbols are exported in that way. I think better to wait the
> maintainer to tell which is preferred there.
I don't really care. As the sole user is an in-kernel module, I'm
gonna append _GPL for now.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists