lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421307300.3008.2.camel@synopsys.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:35:01 +0000
From:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:	"clark.williams@...il.com" <clark.williams@...il.com>,
	"jkacur@...hat.com" <jkacur@...hat.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Vineet Gupta" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: allow building selected tests with non-NPTL
 toolchain

Hi Clark, John,

On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 10:16 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Some architectures are still stuck with non-NPTL toolchains.
> These are for example ARC, Blackfin, Xtensa etc.
> 
> Still rt-tests are very good benchmarks and it would be good to enable use of
> at least selected (those that will be built) tests on those architectures.
> 
> This change makes it possible to only build subset of tests that don't require
> NPTL calls.
> 
> By default behavior is not modified - all tests are built, but if one wants
> to build with non-NPTL toolchain just add "HAVE_NPTL=no" in command line
> or modify "HAVE_NPTL" variable right in Makefile and execute "make".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>
> ---
>  Makefile | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 318a5c6..675edf7 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
>  VERSION_STRING = 0.89
>  
> -sources = cyclictest.c signaltest.c pi_stress.c rt-migrate-test.c	\
> -	  ptsematest.c sigwaittest.c svsematest.c pmqtest.c sendme.c 	\
> -	  pip_stress.c hackbench.c
> +HAVE_NPTL ?= yes
> +
> +ifeq ($(HAVE_NPTL),yes)
> +sources = cyclictest.c pi_stress.c pip_stress.c pmqtest.c rt-migrate-test.c
> +endif
> +
> +sources += signaltest.c ptsematest.c sigwaittest.c svsematest.c sendme.c \
> +	  hackbench.c
>  
>  TARGETS = $(sources:.c=)

I'm wondering if there's a chance to get this patch reviewed and if
there're no objections applied?

Regards,
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ