[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421307300.3008.2.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:35:01 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: "clark.williams@...il.com" <clark.williams@...il.com>,
"jkacur@...hat.com" <jkacur@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vineet Gupta" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: allow building selected tests with non-NPTL
toolchain
Hi Clark, John,
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 10:16 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Some architectures are still stuck with non-NPTL toolchains.
> These are for example ARC, Blackfin, Xtensa etc.
>
> Still rt-tests are very good benchmarks and it would be good to enable use of
> at least selected (those that will be built) tests on those architectures.
>
> This change makes it possible to only build subset of tests that don't require
> NPTL calls.
>
> By default behavior is not modified - all tests are built, but if one wants
> to build with non-NPTL toolchain just add "HAVE_NPTL=no" in command line
> or modify "HAVE_NPTL" variable right in Makefile and execute "make".
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 318a5c6..675edf7 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
> VERSION_STRING = 0.89
>
> -sources = cyclictest.c signaltest.c pi_stress.c rt-migrate-test.c \
> - ptsematest.c sigwaittest.c svsematest.c pmqtest.c sendme.c \
> - pip_stress.c hackbench.c
> +HAVE_NPTL ?= yes
> +
> +ifeq ($(HAVE_NPTL),yes)
> +sources = cyclictest.c pi_stress.c pip_stress.c pmqtest.c rt-migrate-test.c
> +endif
> +
> +sources += signaltest.c ptsematest.c sigwaittest.c svsematest.c sendme.c \
> + hackbench.c
>
> TARGETS = $(sources:.c=)
I'm wondering if there's a chance to get this patch reviewed and if
there're no objections applied?
Regards,
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists