[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150115143855.GD512@earth.universe>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:38:55 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@...ux-mips.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
List for communicating with real GTA04 owners
<gta04-owner@...delico.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] input: tsc2007: Add pre-calibration, flipping and
rotation
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > 1. Perform conversion in input core rather than individual drivers. I
> > think we should allocate a new bitmaps for some transformations and have
> > the code do X/Y flip/clip of the coordinates.
>
> Do you have a suggestion where this should be (I have no clue how
> the input system works or is structured - we just know how to extend a
> driver that uses it)?
>
> > 2. Standardize on bindings. We already have of-touchscreen.c doing
> > rudimentary parsing, we shoudl look into extending it rather than
> > creating myriad of driver-specific bindings.
>
> Ok, looks reasonable.
Documentation is in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.txt
> > Also, do we need swap and flip or do we simply need rotation (like the
> > proposed Broadcom iproc driver has)?
>
> Well, since the DT should describe hardware, there are 3 sets of wires which
> can have a cross-over: X+ and X-, Y+ and Y-, X and Y.
>
> So IMHO hardware has no “rotation”, just crossover of wires. Rotation is an
> interpretation of the result of these connections in combination with some
> panel the touch is glued to and should therefore not be represented in the DT.
>
> As a result we have proposed a scheme without explicit rotation. We specify what
> coordinates X- and X+ should report at their ends (min, max) because the DT
> programmer has to specify them anyways. Flipping is a result of defining these
> coordinates in an ascending or descending way. Only swapping of the X and Y
> wires can’t be implicitly defined so it has its own property. So the scheme we
> have proposed tries to optimize the efforts needed to adapt new boards and write
> DTs and focus the DT on hardware description.
>
> As a bonus we also specify the min and max value to be reported for the touch
> pressure (Z axis) using the same basic principle.
>
> And it is a pure add-on on top of the existing driver so that it attempts not
> to break existing device trees.
from what I can see there are no in-tree-users using any of the
new properties.
> Maybe could you accept it as a first step for this specific driver (and let’s do
> the big standardization work later on)?
That does not work, since you create an ABI.
-- Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists