[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFeThoBqepd8WO4=zqxc2H3SQ+XgbgKATwCO=n3W3B0dpwR9Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:03:45 +0100
From: aurélien bouin <a.bouin@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: broonie <broonie@...nel.org>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: imx: checkpatch cleanup
Hello,
It does not change readability ... Often breaks are in functions parameters ...
Up to you
2015-02-12 13:42 GMT+01:00 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
>
> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 13:07 +0100, Aurelien BOUIN wrote:
> > This patch solve various issue detected by checkpatch.pl
>
> trivia:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> []
> > @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ static unsigned int mx51_ecspi_clkdiv(unsigned int fin, unsigned int fspi,
> > (post << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_POSTDIV_OFFSET);
> > }
> >
> > -static void __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_intctrl(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, int enable)
> > +static void __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_intctrl(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> > + int enable)
>
> Perhaps it'd be better to use this style:
>
> __maybe_unused
> static void foo(...)
>
> ie:
>
> __maybe_unused
> static void mx51_ecspi_intctrl(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, int enable)
>
> etc..
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists