[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150217185012.GI7119@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:50:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, irq: Fix regression caused by commit b568b8601f05
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 06:55:14PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 16, 2015 08:36:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2015-02-16 10:11:13, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > > Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
> > > accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
> >
> > accidentaly?
> >
> > > regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq
> > > nc6000 where we fail to register the ACPI interrupt, and thus
> > > lose eg. thermal notifications leading a potentially overheated
> > > machine.
> > >
> > > So reintroduce support of legacy PIC based ACPI SCI interrupt.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>
> Is anyone taking care of this one or should I take it?
>
> Ingo, Peter?
Gots it, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists