[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317163440.GC31346@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:34:40 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Stefan Hengelein <stefan.hengelein@....de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: remove dead kconfig option OMAP4_ERRATA_I688
* Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [150317 09:32]:
> On 03/17/2015 11:26 AM, santosh shilimkar wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/16/2015 4:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> * Stefan Hengelein <stefan.hengelein@....de> [150225 10:48]:
> >>> The Kconfig-Option OMAP4_ERRATA_I688 is never visible due to a
> >>> contradiction in it's dependencies.
> >>> The option requires ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM to be 'disabled'. However, an
> >>> enclosing menu requires either ARCH_MULTI_V6 or ARCH_MULTI_V7 to be
> >>> enabled. These options inherit a dependency from an enclosing menu,
> >>> that requires ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM to be 'enabled'.
> >>> This is a contradiction and made this option also unavailable for
> >>> non-multiplatform configurations.
> >>>
> >>> Since there are no selects on OMAP4_ERRATA_I688, which would ignore
> >>> dependencies, the code related to that option is dead and can be
> >>> removed.
> >>>
> >>> This (logical) defect has been found with the undertaker tool.
> >>> (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hengelein <stefan.hengelein@....de>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Tony Lindgren suggested to remove the code since nobody complained for
> >>> a few years and Santosh Shilimkar agreed.
> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/25/449
> >>> ---
> >>> As far as I see, this should remove all the code related to
> >>> OMAP4_ERRATA_I688, I hope I didn't remove too much.
> >>
> >> Seems to boot fine, so applying into omap-for-v4.1/fixes-not-urgent.
> >>
> > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
>
> We no longer need i688? I do understand the need to cleanup the macros
> for multi-arch etc.. but loosing a bug workaround for a real silicon
> bug is really an invitation for hard to debug issues IMHO.
Well that code has not been selectable for a few years now. Naturally
we can add it back when it actually does something with multiarch.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists