[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429894419.2927.61.camel@x220>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:53:39 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
DT <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
INPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 1/2] input: misc: da9063: OnKey driver
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 13:45 +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:
> That seems to be a fairly common mistake in the kernel.
It's an easy mistake to make. And as long as people pick an ident that
passes license_is_gpl_compatible() the module will build and load just
fine.
> When I did a
> straw-poll, around 10% of files came up with "GPL v2" and contained
> "any later version" text.
That seems plausible.
I'm inclined to think the difference between "GPL" and "GPL v2" is
mainly an accident of history (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/11/188
for some background). But apparently were stuck with these two idents.
Anyhow, in the last two months I've not come up with a better plan than
regularly check patches for mismatches like the one you made. If you
have a better idea, I'll be all ears.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists