lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLzEkvUAhXCCvtdHEfmJGONkzNu_dBHj1UUm6Et93kXV1Mz0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2015 12:37:24 -0700
From:	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
To:	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
Cc:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>,
	Jim Lin <jilin@...dia.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 19/21] clk: tegra: Add Super Gen5 Logic

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com> wrote:
> From: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
>
> Super clock divider control and clock source mux of Tegra210 has changed
> a little against prior SoCs, this patch adds Gen5 logic to address those
> differences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
> ---
> v2:
>   - Fixed sclk divider address (0x370 -> 0x2c)
>
>  drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile               |    1 +
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-gen5.c |  150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h                  |    3 +
>  3 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-super-gen5.c

I've diffed clk-tegra-super-gen5.c and the existing
clk-tegra-super-gen4.c, and there's a lot of code duplication here.
They're the same pair of functions, with several small changes. Since
the idea behind pulling out the super clock initialization into a
common file was to reuse the same init, could we extend the super-gen4
file (rename if you have to) to support both gens instead?

-- 
Benson Leung
Software Engineer, Chrom* OS
bleung@...omium.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ