[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555A0E19.10807@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:06:49 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
pmeerw@...erw.net
CC: zmxu@...vell.com, jszhang@...vell.com, yrliao@...vell.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: berlin: add an ADC node for the BG2Q
On 18.05.2015 11:19, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> This patch adds the ADC node for the Berlin BG2Q, using the newly added
> Berlin IIO ADC driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> index 187d056f7ad2..97c7e19e3ec6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> @@ -565,6 +565,13 @@
> function = "twsi3";
> };
> };
> +
> + adc: adc {
> + compatible = "marvell,berlin2-adc";
> + interrupt-parent = <&sic>;
Antoine,
a side note on the interrupt-parent property above:
The parent simple-bus node already contains that property. If you
remove the property here, don't the interrupt routines go up the
hierarchy until they find an interrupt-parent set?
So, is it safe to get rid of the extra interrupt-parent property on
the adc node?
Sebastian
> + interrupts = <12>, <14>;
> + interrupt-names = "adc", "tsen";
> + };
> };
>
> sic: interrupt-controller@...0 {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists