[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150602103232.GA11622@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:32:41 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] ASoC: arizona: Export functions to control
subsystem DVFS
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:22:51PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:10:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > > + if (priv->dvfs_reqs)
> > > > + ret = arizona_dvfs_disable(codec);
>
> > > Are you sure that the function shouldn't check for requests? It seems
> > > like every caller is repeating the same check.
>
> > Sorry, I don't understand your comment here. When SYSCLK is disabled
> > we need to disable DVFS so that the codec can't go into suspend in the
> > illegal state of DVFS enabled but insifficient DCVDD. However, if
> > dvfs_reqs==0 DVFS is already disabled so we can save some time.
>
> Sure, but you repeat the same tests for dvfs_reqs at every call site
> which suggests it should be factored into the functions.
I don't. There are two cases that call them if (!dvfs_reqs) and two
that call them if (dvfs_reqs)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists