[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150704190728.6a1b8a5a@endymion.delvare>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 19:07:28 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Iago López Galeiras <iago@...ocode.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Djalal Harouni <djalal@...ocode.com>,
Alban Crequy <alban@...ocode.com>
Subject: Re: config PROC_CHILDREN
Hi Iago,
Please don't top-post.
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:10:45 +0200, Iago López Galeiras wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> The purpose of this option is enabling /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children without
> having to enable CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, which is hidden behind EXPERT.
>
> Regarding its lack of help, documentation is in already in place[1] but perhaps
> that's not clear for the user because as you say the Kconfig help text is missing.
>
> I suggest adding something like:
>
> Provides a fast way to retrieve first level children pids of a task. See
> <file:Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt> for more information.
>
> Do you think that's enough?
That's a start, the reference to Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt is
good but I think we can do better. You need to help the user make the
decision. Why should he/she say Y or N? The user should NOT have to look
at an external documentation file if the answer is N. I would suggest
the following:
Say Y if running any user-space software which takes benefit from this
interface. For example, rkt is such a piece of software.
That being said, I am curious... Is this interface so expensive that it
really deserves a separate option, instead of always enabling it? This
seems to be a fairly generic feature that a lot of scripts and tools
could benefit from (starting with pstree I suppose.)
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists