[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A682C9.7040906@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:56:57 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Fix memory leak in
regulator_resolve_supply()
Hello Mark,
On 07/15/2015 05:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:46:25PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 07/15/2015 01:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> using _regulator_get() I think. A separate, rarely used, path is likely
>>> to have this sort of issue.
>
>> Exactly, do you agree then that a try_module_get() is missing in set_supply()?
>
>> It is OK if I add that in the same patch in v2 or do you prefer that to be
>> in a separate patch?
>
> A separate patch would be better, or even better would be something that
> just replaces everything there with use of the same code path as _get()
> (thanks for volunteering!) but just adding the try_module_get() is fine
> for now.
>
I already posted a v2 of the series which adds a try_module_get() as a
separate patch but I'll add to my TODO list at factoring out both code
paths as a follow-up.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists