[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C1EA95.5060504@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:51:01 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC: <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@...e.com>, <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
<ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] xen: Use the correctly the Xen memory terminologies
Hi Boris,
On 05/08/15 00:16, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 02:12 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> /*
>> * We detect special mappings in one of two ways:
>> @@ -217,9 +232,13 @@ static inline unsigned long
>> bfn_to_local_pfn(unsigned long mfn)
>> /* VIRT <-> MACHINE conversion */
>> #define virt_to_machine(v) (phys_to_machine(XPADDR(__pa(v))))
>> -#define virt_to_pfn(v) (PFN_DOWN(__pa(v)))
>> #define virt_to_mfn(v) (pfn_to_mfn(virt_to_pfn(v)))
>> #define mfn_to_virt(m) (__va(mfn_to_pfn(m) << PAGE_SHIFT))
>> +#define virt_to_pfn(v) (PFN_DOWN(__pa(v)))
>
> This looks like unnecessary change.
Right, I made the mistake when I re-introduced virt_to_mfn in this
version. It was dropped in the previous one.
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>> b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>> index 09dc447..25e3cce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
>> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int xenfb_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>> static unsigned long vmalloc_to_mfn(void *address)
>> {
>> - return pfn_to_mfn(vmalloc_to_pfn(address));
>> + return pfn_to_gfn(vmalloc_to_pfn(address));
>> }
>
> Are you sure? This will return vmalloc_to_pfn(address)).
I guess you mean vmalloc_to_mfn will return vmalloc_to_pfn?
If so, it will be only the case on auto-translated case (because pfn ==
gfn). In the case of PV, the mfn will be returned.
Although, this function is misnamed. It's fixed in a follow-up patch
(see #6) because it's required more renaming than this function. I
didn't want to add such changes within this patch.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists