[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfKVtHPYqB1zjRad2=_xe9LEAuWs8PipNHHC5eUfW=XwChT2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:25:48 +0530
From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...il.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Xander Huff <xander.huff@...com>, jic23@...nel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, knaack.h@....de,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joe.hershberger@...com, joshc@...com, nathan.sullivan@...com,
jaeden.amero@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: adc: xilinx-xadc: Push interrupts into threaded context
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
>
> Well there is no need to use a threaded IRQ. The interrupt handler is quite
> small and doesn't take too much time and doesn't have any delays or sleeps
> in it either.
>
>
Ok thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists