linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:35:00 -0500
From:	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is
 configured or used

On 08/17/2015 05:14 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> One nitpick I noticed after sending my patch: dev can never be NULL in
> smsc911x_probe_config(), so it does not really make sense to check if it is NULL.

No, it doesn't... it should really be something like

if (dev_fwnode(dev))

But dev_fwnode is static inline in property.c, and i'm pretty sure that 
still isn't 100% correct.The best plan might just be to remove the 
check, and abort on failure to find the phy property per your patch.





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/