linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: sun5i: Add C.H.I.P DTS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150922140424.GA4684@lukather>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:04:24 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: sun5i: Add C.H.I.P DTS

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:01:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >In short, this is not about "power supply" but VBUS detection. IIRC,
> >if no VBUS detection method is provided, the phy driver just waits a
> >period of time after an ID pin change and then considers VBUS invalid.
> 
> Right, but that is a hack for boards with no / broken vbus detection
> (or vbus control), we really want to use vbus-det where available,
> so I agree that a TODO comment here would be good.

What's so special in our SoCs that makes that we can't just rely on
the ID pin ? (which seems to be working just fine here)

Other SoCs don't need to rely on such a hack as well.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)