[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1ivSapbRDuQX5iW5MyC=YWiu0poKoFhVKRcut+rLR1fsv2iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:23:56 -0700
From: Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22 2015 at 12:59pm -0400,
> Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>
>>
>> In commit b49a087("block: remove split code in
>> blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}"), discard_granularity and alignment
>> checks were removed. Ideally, with bio late splitting, the upper layers
>> shouldn't need to depend on device's limits.
>>
>> Christoph reported a discard regression on the HGST Ultrastar SN100 NVMe
>> device when mkfs.xfs. We have not found the root cause yet.
>>
>> This patch re-adds discard_granularity and alignment checks by reverting
>> the related changes in commit b49a087. The good thing is now we can
>> remove the 2G discard size cap and just use UINT_MAX to avoid bi_size
>> overflow.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Hi Jens,
Would you please take this one?
>
> Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists