[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151101105801.GB12711@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:58:01 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"Anvin, H Peter" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] efi: a misc char interface for user to update efi
firmware
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:52:52AM +0000, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> Could you share me your dumb file? I did perform negative test, but I did
> not get these dump stack in dmesg. Thanks.
I think almost any file works:
cat /bin/ls > /dev/efi_capsule_loader
> > > +#define UPLOAD_DONE -1
> >
> > Isn't the fact that upload was finished a success message? If so, why is it a
> > negative value?
>
> This is to indicate an upload is done and pending for close(2). If a subsequence
> write(2) perform, return error. Comments inputted by Matt and Andy.
But in that case you can return ERR_OCCURRED. UPLOAD_DONE still doesn't
look like a negative value to me as it signals that the upload was done
and thus successful as no errors happened during the upload.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists