linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] perf report: Support folded callchain output (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151103013535.GD11498@danjae.kornet>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:35:35 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] perf report: Support folded callchain output (v2)

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:46:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:46:06AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 08:04:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > I still think that this is a 'perf report' thing, but one that is
> > > centered in callchains, and that is to be consumed by scripts, not
> > > humans.
>  
> > Agreed.
>  
> > I'm just looking for a way to support it with minimal change. :)
> 
> Hey, me too. A --no-hists flag looks like a quickie, no need to isolate
> callchain code, or anything like that, just one long option switch and
> we get what we need.

Hmm.. okay.  Let me think about the --no-hists flags then.

What do you want to do if the --no-hists flags is used without folded
callchain mode or other than --stdio?

And if you want to print other info in the callchains, what would be
the output of non-folded mode?

I think the simplest solution would be supporting the folded mode only
and error out other cases.  Is it ok to you?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/