[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151104084248.GF29671@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:42:48 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, acme@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf, tools, stat: Abstract stat metrics printing
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:50:22PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
SNIP
> evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE &&
> evsel->attr.config == ( PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_L1D |
> ((PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_READ) << 8) |
> - ((PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MISS) << 16)) &&
> - runtime_l1_dcache_stats[ctx][cpu].n != 0) {
> - print_l1_dcache_misses(out, cpu, evsel, avg);
> + ((PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MISS) << 16))) {
> + if (runtime_l1_dcache_stats[ctx][cpu].n != 0)
> + print_l1_dcache_misses(cpu, evsel, avg, out);
> + else
> + print_metric(ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-dcache hits", 0);
hum, what's the reason for all those else cases
ending up printing nothing?
we have one metric per line anyway right?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists