[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151217084809.GC9239@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:48:09 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, wfg@...ux.intel.com, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: rhashtable: Prevent spurious EBUSY errors on insertion
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:46:00PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
>
> sorry for late test, but unfortunately, my case with rhashtalbe still
> return EBUSY.
> I added some debug code in rhashtable_insert_rehash(), and found:
> *future_tbl is null*
>
> fail:
> /* Do not fail the insert if someone else did a rehash. */
> if (likely(rcu_dereference_raw(tbl->future_tbl))) {
> printk("future_tbl is there\n");
> return 0;
> } else {
> printk("future_tbl is null\n");
> }
>
> any idea why ?
That's presumably because you got a genuine double rehash.
Until you post your code we can't really help you.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists