[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1457078325.20076.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:58:45 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: jeyu@...hat.com, jkosina@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, duwe@....de,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, mbenes@...e.cz,
Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc
Hi Petr,
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
> inline, no error message, return -ENOSYS
OK.
> 3. Added an error message when including
> powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h without HAVE_LIVEPATCH
I don't know why we want to do that, I don't see how it is helpful. It doesn't
even do what it says:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
...
> +#else /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +#error Include linux/livepatch.h, not asm/livepatch.h
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
If I turn on CONFIG_LIVEPATCH then I can quite happily include asm/livepatch.h
and not get an error. So the check doesn't do what the message suggests.
If we *really* want to prevent people from including asm/livepatch.h then it
needs to check for _LINUX_LIVEPATCH_H_. But there's no reason I can see why we
*must* prevent people from including asm/livepatch.h.
And on x86 & s390 it does:
#else
#error Live patching support is disabled; check CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
#endif
Which is also not helpful AFAICS, and just likely to break the build for no
good reason.
> This applies on top of the patches posted by Michael
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/589791/
>
> It enables livepatching. This takes patch 6/8 and 7/8 of v8 as the base.
> (See the reference [1] below) and adds logic for checking offset ranges
> in livepatch with ftrace_location_range.
>
> I tested the sample in the livepatch
Thanks.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists