[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1457078800.20076.4.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 19:06:40 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: jeyu@...hat.com, jkosina@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, duwe@....de,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, mbenes@...e.cz,
Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>, jikos@...nel.org,
vojtech@...e.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, sjenning@...hat.com
Subject: How to merge? (was Re: [PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable
livepatching on powerpc)
Hi livepatch maintainers,
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
>
> Changelog v4:
> 1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> and used it just to convert the function address.
> 2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
> inline, no error message, return -ENOSYS
> 3. Added an error message when including
> powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h without HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> 4. Update some comments.
> Changelog v3:
> 1. Moved -ENOSYS to -EINVAL in klp_write_module_reloc
> 2. Moved klp_matchaddr to use ftrace_location_range
> Changelog v2:
> 1. Implement review comments by Michael
> 2. The previous version compared _NIP from the
> wrong location to check for whether we
> are going to a patched location
>
> This applies on top of the patches posted by Michael
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/589791/
>
> It enables livepatching. This takes patch 6/8 and 7/8 of v8 as the base.
> (See the reference [1] below) and adds logic for checking offset ranges
> in livepatch with ftrace_location_range.
>
> I tested the sample in the livepatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/livepatch.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 1 +
> include/linux/livepatch.h | 2 ++
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 14 +++++++++-
> 9 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/livepatch.c
How should we go about merging this?
Obviously it depends heavily on the content of my series, which will go into
powerpc#next, so it would make sense if this went there too.
I don't see any changes in linux-next for livepatch, so merging it via powerpc
would probably work fine and not cause any conflicts, unless there's some
livepatch changes pending for 4.6 that aren't in linux-next yet?
The other option is that I put my ftrace changes and this in a topic branch
(based on v4.5-rc3), and then that can be merged into both powerpc#next and the
livepatch tree.
Also regardless of who takes it an Ack from Steve for the ftrace changes would
be good.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists