linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30699.1457442839@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:13:59 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2]

Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> but we're left with a lot of references to "system_trusted" (eg.
> restrict_link_to_system_trusted, depends on SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING

How about I pluralise it to SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRINGS?  The fact that one is
called builtin and the other secondary doesn't detract from the fact that
they're both system-wide rings of trusted keys.

Or would you prefer .system_trusted_keys and .secondary_trusted_keys?  Even
though the second is also a "system" trusted keyring.

David