[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160309094424.613668a7@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:44:24 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] tracing: 'hist' triggers
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:54:40 -0600
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> This is v16 of the 'hist triggers' patchset.
>
> This version incorporates a couple changes suggested by Steve.
>
> Patch 1 can be merged into patch 8 from v13, 'tracing: Add lock-free
> tracing_map'. Following the v13 suggestions, I made a couple changes
> to the tracing map constants to clarify the field relationships, and
> added a couple missing comments I noticed while at it.
>
Hi Tom!
I tested this, played with it a little, and I think it's pretty much
ready to go. But I'm very nervous about sending this to Linux-next this
late in the current rc cycle. I would like this in next for a full
cycle before sending it to Linus.
Thus, I'm going to push everything up to but excluding:
tracing: Add lock-free tracing_map
The hist tree that I tested and played with is on my repo in
ftrace/hist branch.
I'll push this to linux-next after 4.6-rc1 is released, and then we can
get it into the 4.7 merge window.
Does that sound fine to you?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists