lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160325170558.GB5028@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:05:58 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, tony@...mide.com,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl: Enable regulators over the powerbus as
 well

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 06:50:18PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> On 25.03.2016 18:19, Mark Brown wrote:

> >What makes you claim that this is a bug in the framework?  Does anything
> >in the machine configuration say that changing the modes is allowed?

> My understanding is that regulator core have to make sure an enabled
> regulator to be in REGULATOR_STATUS_NORMAL. Now it enables the regulator,

No, absolutely not.  Modes are completely orthogonal to enabling and
disabling the regulator - modes reflect an efficiency/accuracy tradeoff
in the regulation, they are nothing to do with the regulator being
enabled.  Setting a mode should not affect the regulator enable state
and enabling the regulator should not affect the mode.

> It might be that I am not getting the logic behind.

Yes, that seems to be the case.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ