linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:06:21 +0200
From:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge
 configuration"

Mark,

On 25.03.2016 17:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 25.03.2016 13:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
>>> subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
>>> patches.
> 
>> Okay, submitting of reverted patches is different I believe:
> 
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg75667.html
> 
> Nope, they're patches like other patches.  A big part of what the
> subject line does is help people work out what they need to look at,
> something that doesn't pattern match doesn't fulfil that need.
> 

regarding pattern matching just remove ^ from the regexp and people
be aware of this "regulator: core" change.

I understand that the reverted commit is a maintainer's fault and by
renaming the subject you may hide it, so talking about people needs
please let them know that the change _reverts_ another commit.

I can not add Fixes: tag, because the change does not fix a commit, and
there is no Reverts: tag due to its obvious redundancy.

Please look at 1 hour old 1701f680407c ("Revert "ppdev: use new parport
device model" ") --- that's IMHO the proper way to create and apply
reverts.

And I disagree with the modified subject and commit message done by you
and without a notice mentioning this your change in the commit message.

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir