[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571624EF.9060707@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:30:39 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@...tec.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
punnaiah choudary kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Han Xu <b45815@...escale.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Priit Laes <plaes@...es.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
<linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 39/50] mtd: nand: omap2: switch to mtd_ooblayout_ops
On 19/04/16 14:22, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:28:50 +0300
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
>
>>> @@ -1921,6 +1927,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> nand_chip->ecc.correct = omap_correct_data;
>>> mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &omap_ooblayout_ops);
>>> oobbytes_per_step = nand_chip->ecc.bytes;
>>> +
>>> + if (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
>>> + min_oobbytes = 1;
>>
>> Shouldn't this have been
>> if (!(nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
>> min_oobbytes = 1;
>> ?
>
> Yep.
>
>>
>>> break;
>>>
>>> case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW:
>>> @@ -2038,10 +2047,8 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* check if NAND device's OOB is enough to store ECC signatures */
>>> - min_oobbytes = (oobbytes_per_step *
>>> - (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size)) +
>>> - (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ?
>>> - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1);
>>> + min_oobbytes += (oobbytes_per_step *
>>> + (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size));
>>> if (mtd->oobsize < min_oobbytes) {
>>> dev_err(&info->pdev->dev,
>>> "not enough OOB bytes required = %d, available=%d\n",
>>>
>>
>> After the above changes BCH with HW ECC worked fine but BCH with SW ECC still failed.
>> I had to fix it up with the below patch. This is mainly because chip->ecc.steps wasn't
>> yet initialized before calling nand_bch_init().
>>
>> After the below patch it worked fine with bch4 (hw & sw), bch8 (hw & sw) and ham1.
>> I couldn't yet verify bch16 though.
>
I just verified that bch16 works as well.
> Thanks for the fix, but I'd prefer fixing the bug for all soft BCH
> users.
>
> Could you try this patch?
I tried your patch and it worked fine.
You will still need the below change to omap2.c
--
cheers,
-roger
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index 0abfba6..33c8fde 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
@@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
- if (section)
+ if (section >= chip->ecc.steps)
return -ERANGE;
/*
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists