[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1464101004.1835.14.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:43:24 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: mark bcache as orphan
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:38 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> The submitted patches are not being reacted upon, and Jens is only picking
> up stable fixes on an rather ad-hoc basis.
>
> Link: lkml.kernel.org/r/574462C5.40307@...nel.dk
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 5f83015..c9906d6 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2288,7 +2288,7 @@ BCACHE (BLOCK LAYER CACHE)
> M: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
> L: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
> W: http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org
> -S: Maintained
> +S: Orphan
> F: drivers/md/bcache/
Sections marked as Orphan generally
don't also have a named maintainer.
Should Kent still be listed here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists